>>>>> "B" == Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B> Also, IIRC, there are some redistribution issues with adding a
B> JRE to your projects -- which is one reason that it's rare to
B> see JREs included with Free Software projects.
B> Has anyone checked this out yet?
OK, I just did check it out, and I'm pretty sure that adding the JRE is
very inappropriate.
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/jre/j2re-1_3_0-linux-license.html
Two things in particular bug me:
* The package with JRE included is non-redistributable. That
is, people can't download the exe with the JRE in it and
post it anywhere.
* We agree to indemnify Sun against any problems with the
JRE. This seems totally reckless and stupid.
I understand why there is support for having this in the distributed
exe, but it just seems like a really bad idea.
--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--
For this reason, I've deleted the *-withjava-* stuff from
SourceForge. I've got copies and I'll put it back up if/when we decide
to do so, but for right now it seems like a bad move to make.
--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--
~Mr. Bad
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
freenet:MSK@SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
"Statements like this give the impression that this article was
written by a madman in a drug induced rage" -- Ben Franklin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl