>>>>> "B" == Bad  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

    B> Also, IIRC, there are some redistribution issues with adding a
    B> JRE to your projects -- which is one reason that it's rare to
    B> see JREs included with Free Software projects.

    B> Has anyone checked this out yet?

OK, I just did check it out, and I'm pretty sure that adding the JRE is
very inappropriate.

        http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/jre/j2re-1_3_0-linux-license.html

Two things in particular bug me:

        * The package with JRE included is non-redistributable. That
          is, people can't download the exe with the JRE in it and
          post it anywhere.

        * We agree to indemnify Sun against any problems with the
          JRE. This seems totally reckless and stupid.

I understand why there is support for having this in the distributed
exe, but it just seems like a really bad idea.

--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--

For this reason, I've deleted the *-withjava-* stuff from
SourceForge. I've got copies and I'll put it back up if/when we decide
to do so, but for right now it seems like a bad move to make.

--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--NOTE--

~Mr. Bad

-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ 
 freenet:MSK@SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
 "Statements like this give the impression that this article was
  written by a madman in a drug induced rage"  -- Ben Franklin
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to