Thanks Oskar - seems I spoke too soon.
Maybe then we need to go back to the 'with-java' freenet.
Maybe it's worth approaching Sun and getting a clarification.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oskar Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] JRE License
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:09:20AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> > And, if Freenet now works with windoze jview.exe, then this whole 'with
> > java' freenet can fly to the bit-bucket - good riddance!
>
> Define "works". As of last time we dealt with it, Freenet did run with
> jview and you could request and insert stuff, but because the socket
> timeout system was badly broken the node was functioning severely below
> par.
>
> > And, if the Freenet with jview.exe problem is sorted, then why the hell
> > bother with finding other versions of java? Maybe stick another option
"Use
> > windows java interpreter" at the front of the install, so most users
won't
> > be bothered with a java search at all.
> > That way, the install can be truly fast, simple and foolproof, which is
what
> > I aimed for with the 'with java Freenet' anyway.
>
> Which is what we tried in the first place, but then we found ourselves
> with a network that was grinding to a standstill because of a multitude of
> undocumented total fuck ups within that JVM.
>
> --
> 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
> 'Here,' Montag touched his head.
> 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
>
> Oskar Sandberg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
