On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:24:34AM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > Well, this is how I'm doing it now: > > CHK encryption key = make_key(hash(data)) > > i.e., NO padding. Why?? This just makes the wrose design a world of pain. > What doesn't make sense to me is using data+padding to generate > the encryption key. It would make the code unnecessarily complicated, > without serving any purpose. No, because make_key(hash(data+padding)) means that the padding fits nicely intpo a different layer. AGL _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Steven Hazel
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Notes on 0.4 design Scott Gregory Miller
