On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:52:46AM +0100, Adam Langley wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 10:47:01PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > It is the popular conception that fuzzy searching in Freenet would not > > be possible, yet early-on we discussed a proposal which could achieve > > just this in an efficient and elegant manner. > > Thought about it. Made up a simple simulator. Found the fuzzy matching > functions were so damm slow it wasn't viable to simulated it. Gave up. News to me. What fuzzy matching functions did you use? I have found some pretty efficient ones. Ian.
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... coderman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fu... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fu... Oskar Sandberg
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Ian Clarke
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freenet - The Next Generation : Fuzzy S... Benjamin Coates
PGP signature