RE: [freenet-devl] Freenet DOS defense strategy???

[Benjamin Coates]

>From Ray Heasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>The solution is to limit the percentage of the datastore that can be
>affected by reads, as explained further in my reply to Ian on the "Another
>possible bug" thread. Essentially you have two datastores, one for caching.
>
>I can't get anyone to comment on this proposal though. :-(
>
>Oh well.
>
>Cya,
>Ray

The big problem I see with the 'two datastores' system (besides deciding what 
% to devote to inserts vs. requests) is that it assumes that the key is routed 
correctly when it is inserted, and that this location remains stable...  I 
don't think we can rely on either of these to be true.

--
Benjamin Coates


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl