> I believe that someone is working on a new FProxy implementation for > 0.4. This is where I suggest people concerned by this focus their > efforts. How is your java? ;-) This is a rumour that no one will admit to. It has yet to be substantiated that such a project is being undergone. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Rob Cakebread
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed... Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Tavin Cole
- RE: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Rob Cakebread
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed... Rob Cakebread
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! David McNab
