Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't name this thread, and I don't have an obsessive hatred of it, I
> just didn't like a lot of what I saw inside there. You have to admit
> that the HTTP implementation could have been better (doing > /dev/null
> with all the options just rubs me the wrong way).

ok, fine.  What options do you want to handle?  The only one I can think of
that makes sense in this context is Range.

theo

PGP signature

Reply via email to