Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:06:07PM +0100, Theodore Hong wrote: > > I've actually started to have some more time now, so I was planning on > > coming back into development a bit instead of just writing papers. =) > > Which are the main classes to look at where you've started to do work > > on this already? > > The stuff I did back then is in Freenet.node.interfaces.http (you'll > need to move the experimental branch). I'm not sure that it is useful > though, we changed the way the Interfaces are defined since I wrote > that, so it won't even compile (the Util class has a multipart splitting > method though - and one that doesn't split the data into Strings as to > boot! I was told later that the correct way of doing that is with a > rolling hash value, so it could be nicer). Rolling hash value? I don't get what that has to do with splitting. theo
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Mark J. Roberts
- [freenet-devl] [OT] Competition Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Scott Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Theodore Hong
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Theodore Hong
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! Theodore Hong
PGP signature