|
Hi,
I've had another go at building freenet 0.4 into a
windows exe which relies on the windows jview jvm.
But to get it to compile, I had to make the
following changes (simply inserting 'public'):
Freenet/node/State.java:37:
public final long
id;
Freenet/transport/tcpTransport.java:12:
abstract public class
tcpTransport implements Transport {
Freenet/node/states/data/DataState.java:11:
abstract public class DataState
extends State {
How would people feel about these changes going in
to the cvs code?
I still feel that the Visual Java-produced
freenet.exe is still worth looking into, since it seems to work far better with
the windows jview.exe than did the Sun-compiled jar file.
As for the Windows XP issue, where this new OS
won't have jview?
My thoughts are, for now, fuck 'em.
It'll take quite a while for WinXP user base to get
anywhere near the size of the 98/NT/2k userbase.
By that time, Sun will likely have released their
jview replacement.
Cheers
David
|
