Well, note that FNP is a work in progress. Changes have been made since I last worked on that document, and more are in the pipeline. Having a working RFC draft is certainly a good thing, but we are not in a position where we can commit to a protocol (as the current problems illustrate.)
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:47:32PM -0500, William Glover wrote: > Thank you. Looks like most of my work is done. :) > I'm doing FCP next so that I can have a complete document if folks decide we > need a node RFC and a client RFC. Hopefully, I will be able to incorporate > your work by this weekend in the rough draft. > > On Wednesday 29 May 2002 03:37 am, you wrote: > > The FNP draft is here: > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Oskar Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
