-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Those "multiple instances" are just threads. Just the JVM alone has a few threads of its own. 111 sounds a bit excessive, though.
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 17:53, Michael Wiktowy wrote: > I have found on recent 0.5 pre-releases (including pre2) that after a > while (running overnight) the load of the node is pegged at 100% while > browsing and my system is slowed down dramatically. On running lsof -i > on my linux system it looks like there are a few separate instances of > Freenet running on my system. Symptoms of this are many repetitions of a > java process listening on 8888 and 8481 and my node port 21872 (111 > repetitions of each LISTEN entry to be exact). I can assure you that I > did not start up my Freenet node 111 times. I was under the impression > that there is one LISTENing process per FCP/FNP port that spawns other > connections on other ports as necessary. > > Environment after closing down my Freenet browser (an possibly freeing > up threads): > > > JVM Vendor Sun Microsystems Inc. <http://java.sun.com/> > JVM Name Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM > JVM Version 1.3.1_02-b02 > > Operating System Linux > OS Version 2.4.18-10 > > Total size of the data store 200 MB > Free space in the data store 2,416 KB > Used space in the data store 202,384 KB > > Total pooled threads 111 > Available pooled threads 25 > Pooled threads in use 86 > > > > Is this how things are supposed to be? I notice that the Total pooled > threads matches the 111 Listening ports and that could have been the > number in use at the time that I did the lsof -i . I was under the > impression that the number of java threads would be equal to the number > of java processes accessing ports or the number of java process entries > in the ps list. As it is now, the lsof and ps commands list many many > many times more then the pooled thread number including many repeats > (111 entries for each unique connection to other nodes). > > Oh ... another thing that would prevent kibibyte vs. kilobyte questions > would be to put "Total size of the data store" in the same units as the > "Free space ..." and "Used space ...". That is more of a cosmetic thing > though. > > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl - -- Trying to establish voice contact . . . please yell into keyboard. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj2k70IACgkQqpueKcacfLTKlwCdF6yEL6pbzZrLAb0wdAQw/ZhJ o18An0ScGI1pyLqDbGJKgn8jAEDVT2pp =0r3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
