Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The disadvantage is that it can't possibly work because TCP does not
> provide a way beyond the most crude imaginable to tell the other end to
> use a given bandwidth.

(Nor does freenet.) Both work though, contrary to what you state. TCP
handles constipated connections fine, if a little wasteful. It doesn't
care whether this constipation comes form overloaded hardware,
software deliberately dropping/delaying low-prioritised packets, or
whatever.

It may be crude, but so is a club.

-- 
Robbe

Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to