Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The disadvantage is that it can't possibly work because TCP does not > provide a way beyond the most crude imaginable to tell the other end to > use a given bandwidth.
(Nor does freenet.) Both work though, contrary to what you state. TCP handles constipated connections fine, if a little wasteful. It doesn't care whether this constipation comes form overloaded hardware, software deliberately dropping/delaying low-prioritised packets, or whatever. It may be crude, but so is a club. -- Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature