On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:21:18PM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > easier for some users, but unless we provide a link to the source _for > that particular compile_ somewhere in the code, it's a probable GPL > violation (Joe gets from fp.org, a release, so could get the source. > Mary gets from Joe, Adam gets from Mary... Adam has no easy way to > find the source, and if Mary or Joe disappears, is stuffed).
We simply include a link to http://freenetproject.org/ somewhere in the distribution (possibly in the COPYING file) saying that the source can be obtained there. I don't believe that the GPL demands that the source be available anonymously just because the binary is. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
msg05512/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
