Wouldn't it be preferable to have a generic "GetNodeStatus" command which 
contained more general information, including EstimatedLoad?

Ian.

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:41:00PM +1100, fish wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 06:05:55PM +1100, fish wrote:
> > > 
> > > can this be done already?  It'd be useful for me ;)  Or at least, some
> > > indication of when I should stop throwing threads at fred (other than an
> > > RNF return, hahah)
> > Go code it then.
> 
> The attached patch/files implent a ClientLoad FCP message, which returns:
> 
> NodeLoad
> EstimatedLoad=[current estimated load percentage]
> EndMessage
> 
>       - fish

> sh: gzcat: command not found

> Index: src/freenet/node/Main.java
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/Main.java,v
> retrieving revision 1.129
> diff -u -3 -p -u -r1.129 Main.java
> --- src/freenet/node/Main.java        7 Dec 2002 01:42:10 -0000       1.129
> +++ src/freenet/node/Main.java        15 Dec 2002 04:36:32 -0000
> @@ -1668,6 +1668,7 @@ public class Main {
>     
>          // FCP messages
>          mh.addType( FCPRawMessage.class, ClientHello.messageName,     
>ClientHello.class     );
> +        mh.addType( FCPRawMessage.class, ClientLoad.messageName,      
>ClientLoad.class     );
>          mh.addType( FCPRawMessage.class, GenerateSVKPair.messageName, 
>GenerateSVKPair.class );
>          mh.addType( FCPRawMessage.class, GenerateCHK.messageName,     
>GenerateCHK.class     );
>          mh.addType( FCPRawMessage.class, ClientGet.messageName,       
>ClientGet.class       );


-- 
Ian Clarke                ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project                                 http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage                                       http://locut.us/

_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to