On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:21:29PM -0000, Dave Hooper wrote: > > > While this is pretty much the best way to go from a paranoia standpoint, > it > > > seems to be the worst from a "people complaining that freenet is > useless" > > > standpoint. :) > > > > Why? > > Because: > "* No CSS support. Hence CSS is blocked. Including inline style. As I thought I made clear, this is a preliminary implementation, and will be improved. If you want to live on the edge (i.e. run the devel branch), you can expect a rough ride. > * ?date= links, and "?"'s in checked links, are blocked again (this will > be fixed). > * No <base href> support, this might hurt a few hand-coded sites This will also get fixed. > * Plenty of other bugs and unfeatures :)" Ditto. > > At first glance one could be forgiven for thinking the new annonymity filter > will perform "too" well, to the extent that present (and future) freesites > are rendered unviewable. But as long as the "people" who are complaining > about freenet useability stay clear of the unstable branch (as well they > should) then I wouldn't expect too many complaints. Unless the new filter > is in the regular branch too... It will eventually go into the regular branch. When it does it should yield usability improvements due to a more sane filtering system, and URL rewriting for external URLs (not implemented yet, but easy to do in the new system). > > dave >
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03 http://freenetproject.org/
msg06128/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
