-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 24 February 2003 12:04 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Would it be a good idea to allow an extra field on DataRequests, > something like > FailIfDNFAfter=<number of seconds> > > ? > This would be checked against the failure table (along with the HTL, > obviously). A node could impose a minimum value for it, thus replicating > the current failtable behaviour. The failtable would be a fixed size and > keys would not be removed from it except to make way for newer failures.
A DNF wouldn't be appropriate IMO. What's the list of FCP errors? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Wp7qx533NjVSos4RAouGAKDRSMwWrrogyv8zwPegf7tExTp1+QCfZbCu MhEfSjSyUczZ236Q1+f5a9c= =LcfC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
