On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:08:28PM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:28:15PM -0600, Scott Miller wrote: > > Remember though, guys, that UDP is unreliable, so you're going to need a > > protocol for determining if your message was received, or you're going > > to need a timeout. Freenet was designed to be protocol agnostic, but > > its probably not tuned for lossy transports. > > The node already has lots of timeouts; I'm not sure that it would be a > problem. Oskar concurs IIRC.
Yeah, but this is an entirely different case. In this case we may send
a UDP packet thats dropped somewhere on the Internet, but the node may
be there and a TCP connection would still have succeeded.
Scott
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
