On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:31 am, Jim Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, [iso-8859-1] Some Guy wrote:
> > Here's a neat paper Zooko (the MNet guy) pointed out:
> > http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/douceur02sybil.html They argue you'd need a
> > central authority to prevent a sybil attack.  I think they're wrong.
>
> The author's claim is negative: he proves that given a reasonable set of
> assumptions, it is impossible for a large network without a certification
> authority to prevent a single attacker from successfully masquerading as a
> number of users.  Once one or more attackers have done so, they can then
> expand their foothold by endorsing one another as well as other new
> attackers.
>
> His analysis applies to any large-scale p2p network.  There are at least
> two defenses: either create some sort of certification authority (perhaps
> a supervisory p2p network) or allow/encourage fragmentation of the target
> network.

Come now, This is not impossible. GNUnet does it. And does it well. I posted a 
way to adapt this to Freenet's archticture a while back. It can be done. It 
just requires a big code over hall.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to