David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
> On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:16, David McNab wrote:
> 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED],-4C87kRu4QB7Z5UmZpSpn
>> iBlrmwJtDKr35AZ-m-jDEg,AAEC--8.txt
> 
> Well, this is pretty ugly, if you ask me. From what you said on IRC I 
> thought you'd want something like [EMAIL PROTECTED],fjewf,aaa/file.ext. Which 
> I 
> would find much more logical: people can deduct from the filename what 
> it is (though the filename may be fake, of course) and fproxy can get a 
> filename for background downloading from it. Also, that is the way it 
> was with Freenet 0.5.

That's a semantic problem because the slash implies a multiplicity of
items available within the one CHK.

If you want a URI to be more self-explanatory, try something like:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED],yadayada.explicit_alien_pr0n.jpg

That will work fine in the new node builds.

-- 
Cheers
David

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to