Even if DADVSI is passed, the case of Freenet remains debatable. In fact, DADVSI says that it's forbidden to develop networks being explicitly designed for illegal file sharing. As you can guess, this is stupid: How judges will define if a network is designed for that or not ? It's even more true for Freenet, as the main goal is the freedom of speech, and clearly not illegal file sharing.
Thinking of it logically FileZilla client/server is more illegal then Freenet.
-- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
