Heh.

The point is, the most useful index is one with detailed and preferably
third party (or third party reviewed) descriptions.

On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:37:45AM +0100, Volodya wrote:
> > With no description and only two letters it could be anything, assuming
> > kp stands for kiddy porn says what about you?
> 
> Well played.
> 
> Unfortunately "the elite of Freenet" has been fighting against "Freenet is 
> Pedonet"
> point-of-view for so long that they themselves started believing that. 
> "Anti-thesis
> becomes a thesis".
> 
>               - Volodya
> 
> P.S. To make sure that it's not only a "destructive" criticism, but to offer 
> an
> alternative: It's possible to view content on freenet as "Wide range of 
> topics, some of
> which may be child pornography" rather than "Child pornography as well as 
> wide range of
> other topics".
> 
> -- 
> http://freedom.libsyn.com/   Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
> http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki
> 
> "None of us are free until all of us are free."
>                  ~ Mihail Bakunin
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to