On Friday 30 November 2007 08:54, Florent Daignière wrote: > > Obviously I expect the above will evolve over time. However, IMHO it would be > > significantly better at matching demand to supply than the current algorithm > > while not sacrificing routing, and would therefore be a major improvement in > > performance, which is one of the most important problems Freenet needs to > > deal with. > > You proposal is far away from tit-for-tat ... How do you prevent > leachers from forgetting to send a "I want to process requests" flag ?
Tit-for-tat can be layered on top of any sensible load management scheme (not easily on the current system though). It's not something we need to deal with right now.
pgpNPS91QBWbs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
