* Colin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-05 17:13:22]: > As a ignorant user, I think that's as a general principal, Freenet > should try to be as browser agnostic as possible.. > > 1) Firefox may not be the dominant browser down the line- Freenet > shouldn't constantly chase the tale of different browsers. > 2) Most users don't use Firefox currently. Most general web users still > use IE or Safari, depending on what their PC shipped with. > 3) Freenet is a server process, and optimization shouldn't suffer unless > absolutely necessary over a network. > 4) It's considered "impolite" to modify settings in programs that you > didn't ship. You don't want Freenet to get a reputation as a invading > your system. > 5) I think there may be other ways to fix the problem.
Which ones ? The one you propose below can't work. > > One of the way to get around the persistent connection limit is to > connect to Freenet on multiple hostnames, or DNS addresses. Isn't it a per-ip setting ? I don't see the point of limiting the number of simultaneous connections at all if it's not on a per ip basis. > For example, if Freenet is running on the local system, the URLS on the > page could be given multiple ways. How do you detect it's running on the local system ? What if it isn't ? NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
