* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-02 01:49:28]: > On Friday 01 August 2008 21:22, Florent Daignière wrote: > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-31 23:08:40]: > > > > > On Thursday 31 July 2008 21:47, Florent Daignière wrote: > > > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-31 20:46:26]: > > > > > > > > > Surely it is less likely that openssl is available than md5sum?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > openssl is available by default on macos whereas openssl isn't... so far > > > > we didn't get any complain. > > > > > > But on *nix, is it more common/at least as common? > > > > It's common on *bsd and open-solaris has it by default too iirc > > Others are probably an insignificant portion of our userbase... and can > > probably compile the binary themselves if their OS doesn't have it. > > > What about linuxen?
They are not *nix :p As far as I know most, if not all of them, do bundle openssl by default.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
