On Wednesday 26 November 2008 03:09, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Michael Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > Florent Daignière wrote:
> >> * Zero3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-25 23:55:20]:
> >>
> >>> Shouldn't we just accept that fact that people are moving towards
> >>> mobility, and that most likely won't change anytime soon? :).
> >>>
> >>
> >> I would really appreciate if you could share your insight on the topic:
> >> How exactly would you design a fully decentralized protocol where most
> >> of the nodes are hardly ever connected and mostly unreachable?
> >
> > It's a very hard problem, but that's life: many people are moving away
> > from fixed PCs towards mobile devices with intermittent connectivity.
> > Maybe P2P as we know it can't survive in that world... time will tell, I
> > guess.
> 
> We did have some discussion back in May:
>    
http://archives.freenetproject.org/message/20080508.004108.a9bb6270.en.html
> 
> Basically, this give very long term passive request.

Sure. There are possibilities. But it's a hard problem and not something IMHO 
we should be spending time on right now. That's why I've scheduled it for 
0.10:
0.8 - stabilise current features, merge db4o, new metadata format maybe, UOM 
for freenet-ext, basic main:ext and plugin dependancies, maybe more work on 
searching.
0.9 - splitfile crypto randomization (insert security), tunnels (security), 
bloom filters (performance), UI refactoring (usability)
0.10 - passive requests, long-term requests, possibly transport plugins
1.0 - debug everything

Full passive requests and long-term requests (which IMHO depend on full 
passive requests) are likely to be a *MAJOR* task, I don't see it being 
realistic to postpone 0.8 until they are ready. We can argue over 0.9 vs 
0.10, but bloom filters would really help long term/passive requests, and 
IMHO for acceptable security we can't have bloom filters without tunnels.
> 
> > Cheers,
> > Michael

Attachment: pgpHrE7k0MayB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to