* Ian Clarke <ian.cla...@gmail.com> [2009-04-02 13:09:14]: > Whichever source control system we switch to, I propose that we outsource > the repository hosting. For example, if its git, we should use github. > > Reasons: > > - At least in the case of github, it will be free > - We don't have to worry about setting up and administering the repository > - Services like github have a lot of other useful add-ons like a nice web > interface to the repository > - Because of how git works, we can trivially migrate the repository > elsewhere if there is a problem > > Anyone disagree? If so, why? >
Toad said on an other thread you wanted us to keep the same kind of "workflow" : all the devs are pushing to the same repository... How does what you have written above integrate in the picture? Now I am confused. Do we want to lose the auto-build process? The bts integration, and other related things? How do you want released to be rolled? NextGen$ _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
