Evan Daniel schrieb:
> That is fundamentally a hard problem.
> - Advogato is not perfect.  I am certain there will be some amount of
> spam getting through; hopefully it will be a small amount.
> - With Advogato, the amount of spam possible is well defined.  With
> FMS and WoT it is not.  Neither of them have an upper bound on the
> amount of spam.

How do you define spam?
One limit per identity is the amount of messages which are accepted per day. 
And if you trust some
active indentities, which think the same as you, you will get nearly no spam at 
all because they
already marked it as spam. FMS/WoT depends on the trust relationship between 
people and them telling
each other about third partys.

> - Being too good at solving the spam problem means we are too good at
> mob censorship.  Both are problems.  In practice, the goal should be
> to strike an appropriate balance between the two, not simply to
> eliminate spam.

Since you cannot say what is spam and what not, this is relative. In FMS, you 
can choose to trust
those that think the same as you and you will get their spam markings. Can you 
get the same with
avogato?

> - I believe that Advogato is capable of limiting spam to levels where
> the system is usable, even in the case of reasonably determined
> spammers.  If the most they can aspire to is being a nuisance, I don't
> think the spammers will be as interested.  If spamming takes work and
> doesn't do all that much, they'll give up.  The actual amount of spam
> seen in practice should be well below the worst possible case -- if
> and only if the worst case isn't catastrophic.

How much noice will it allow? The alice bot spam in frost was also just 
annoying, but i do think
that many new users where annoyed and left frost and freenet. So a default 
system should not only
make it usable, but also relative spamfree from the view of the majority.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to