As I see in the statistics (http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) IE6 has 14.5% share and radically decreasing. In my opinion, I think it should be left dead as it should have been a long time ago. I don't think if somebody uses that good-for-nothing browser, he will be too irritated seeing something is broken in it.
sashee On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Caco Patane<cacopat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think he means that users in "poor" areas usually run pirated versions >> of XP with the included IE6. Many of these installations won't have a >> functional Windows Update because of the "Genuine Advantage" stuff >> Microsoft pushes through it. Wich means that they won't get IE updates >> automatically, and probably won't/can't upgrade manually. > > That's it! But not only poor areas, only companies and laptop users > run genuine software. Brand computers (Dell, IBM, etc) are only > purchased by multinational corporations. I used an original copy of > windows for a work in a big corp, not even un goverment offices (kinda > fun). I think that the same scenarios goes for all latin america... > Venezuela, Bolivia and Cuba are in "delicate" positions regarding > freedom of speech. Chavez already closed a TV channel =D > > For the PNG thing, we can use the PNG with transparent background and > in the <head> tag include: > > <!--[if IE 6]> > <script type="text/javacript" src="source_to_script_that_fix_that.js" /> > <![endif]--> > > No new image is needed, those javascripts "fix" it. > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl@freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
