So, the wrapper works correctly on 64bit? I was under the impression 64bit wasn't supported?
On Mar 9, 2010 5:11 AM, "Christian Funder Sommerlund" <li...@zero3.dk> wrote: Hi all It seems like there is a bit of confusion about the Windows Installer's "Did not respond to signal" errors, so I'd like to explain what it means, and hopefully clear up any misunderstandings. --- What happens? --- The error is thrown in a messagebox to the user when the Freenet Starter (the platform glue that handles UAC elevation and sends the start signal to the service) detects that the wrapper fails during startup (technically: the service status goes from STARTING -> STOPPED instead of STARTING -> RUNNING). This doesn't really have anything to do with the installer, as all of these failures happen in the wrapper. The installer is, however, nice enough to tell the user that the wrapper startup failed. In the next version, I will clarify the error messsage and ask the user to look at wrapper.log for more information instead. --- So why does the wrapper fail? --- If wrapper.log contains only the line: STATUS | wrapper | 2009/10/30 17:16:22 | Freenet background service installed. ... it means that the wrapper (when it had admin permissions) succeeded in installing the service. The lack of any more lines suggests that the wrapper (and thereby the LocalService account) is missing read/write permissions to the installation folder. We explicitly give this out during installation, so this shouldn't happen. However, various sources suggest that this sometimes fails, but nobody has been able to reproduce or help me debug it. I'm constantly trying to work with reporters, but they have a tendency to disappear just as quickly as they arrive. Besides the case mentioned above, every other report seems to be random stuff. I've seen: - One error about the user missing read access to the Java files (which you obviously should have if you want to run Java software) - One about the node being too slow to start (and thereby being killed by the Windows service system) - One about a user manually moving the datastore but not giving the service permissions to write to the new location - One case where reinstallation fixed the issue - One where the user's system was so messed up that he couldn't even access the Windows event viewer - One where the LocalService account has lost parts of its registry access to normal Windows keys We could technically check for some of the above issues and warn the user before installation, but I'm afraid that they will just keep coming around in new flavors. If the user's system is messed up, anything can happen really... Note that I cannot reproduce any of these myself. I've tried numerous times on XP, Vista and Win7 machines (32 + 64 bit) without any luck. --- Reporting the bug --- I appreciate that people are submitting failures to https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3624 - but I cannot do much about them without the proper information. Please see http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Installing_on_Windows#Service_did_not_respond_to_signal . --- The old installer --- I have no idea why some (toad!?!) are recommending people to use the old Java installer, but I'd like to seriously recommend you *not* to do so. It will *not* work on Vista and Win7 because it does not handle UAC elevation in any way. It might work on XP, but has several big privacy flaws (it will leave lots of traces that the uninstaller won't remove) and uses the clumsy custom freenet user, besides not having been maintained for years. Please understand that this is nothing personal against the previous maintainer(s). I'm only concerned about not messing up our users' systems. - Zero3 _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
