On Sunday 07 March 2010 18:31:42 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, > > > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. > > > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more > > > than a day of work. I'll be skiing for a week from today, so I can > > > look at the new templating stuff 2 weeks from now. > > Okay great, we'll merge Bombe's stuff and then let sashee update it before > > merging web-pushing. > > I do get the feeling that you largely underestimate what has to be done to > rid > Fred of HTMLNode and introduce a template engine. Practically everything in > freenet.clients.http.* needs to be refactored, in fact it would probably be > easier to just nuke it and rewrite it from scratch. :) > > I am currently still in the process of rewriting Freetalk's web interface to > use the template engine and yes, I did rewrite it completely from scratch > because adapting the existing code is a nightmare as HTMLNode goes way too > deep to be able to change existing code with a reasonable amount of effort. > > I don't know when the Freetalk web interface is finished because my free time > is currently limited. The template engine still lacks a couple of features > that I plan to implement (which will happen during the Freetalk adaption) so > I > would advise against prematurely integrating it into Fred.
Okay, so we should merge web-pushing sooner rather than later, and not wait for the templating engine.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
