On 03/25/2010 09:12 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Thursday 25 March 2010 22:03:40 Ximin Luo wrote: > >> To this end, how about this - for each subproject "project", have 2 repos, >> >> - project >> - project-shared >> >> "project" is the main repo that people fork, and which reviewed code is >> pulled into. "project-shared" is a repo which more people can commit to, >> with these commits being pulled into "project" just like another fork? > > Hmm, replace "project" with "project-official" and "project-shared" with > "project-staging". Do you see a slight resemblance to what we have now?
no, it's entirely different. "project-official" is currently a shadow of "project-staging" that exactly tracks it and follows its history. "project" would be your "branch that follows the latest reviewed code" and "project-shared" would be my "shared branch that every contributor can commit to". X _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
