On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 14:33 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Saturday 03 July 2010 23:50:00 Evan Daniel wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Marco A. Calamari <marc...@dada.it>
> wrote:

> > Huh?  So don't upgrade until the insert finishes, or use persistent
> > inserts.  The last one wasn't mandatory for a week, iirc.
> 
> Agreed, that doesn't make any sense: As long as an insert is
> persistent it should finish the insert even after a restart with a new
> build.
> 
> So please explain *EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED*, instead of just vaguely
> grumbling without giving us enough information to debug!

Please do not become nervous and do not scream.

I'm inserting a rather big site (over 20000 parts) using
 jSite, with an effective bandwidth of 0.3 KB/sec (calculated
 by jSite. The site usually insert in 4-7 days.
No bug at all, but if an update become mandatory in less days
 that the site inserts, the jSite insert obviously fail.

I do not know how insert sites in other ways; persistent insert
 are only for files, isn't it?

I'm not grumbling.  Peace.   Marco

-- 

+--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+
| il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello |
| the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother          |
| Marco A. Calamari mar...@marcoc.it  http://www.marcoc.it   |
| DSS/DH:  8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B |
+ PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to