On 11/06/14 15:01, xor wrote: > On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:52:22 AM Florent Daigniere wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 21:24 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: > >>> Hence my question: > >>> Does a Java FreenetTray could be more suitable ? or Python + Qt > >> > >> maybe ? > >> > >> Java is debatable, because it's the same language as Freenet, but I've > >> never used it for UI and my impression is it has awful support. Python > >> + > >> Qt has the same problem of not being already available on the end > >> system. (and I haven't used it for UI before, either) > > > We had a java tray at some point... and got rid of it. Users were > > complaining that keeping a JVM running (and its associated memory > > footprint) to be able to start/stop freenet was overkill and defeating > > the purpose. > > Which also applies to C# unfortunately.... Does it apply at all at this stage? I mean, memory is somewhat less of an issue on the average computer than it used to be?
Also, how memory efficient is C# anyway (on Windows)? It might be better than Java...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
