Any thoughts on removing (in 1469 or later - scope creep bad!) fproxy.allowedHosts? Not to be confused with fproxy.allowedHostsFullAccess, this is a list of IPs / netmasks outside of which FProxy closes the connection immediately after accepting it. [0]
Why does the functionality exist? This seems like a confusing way to poorly reimplement a firewall's job. Unlike fullAccessHosts which will respond with a 403, the user gets no feedback. The motivation for this is twofold - if a feature is useless it should probably be removed, and it cost jeffpc and I two hours to figure out why FProxy was immediately closing connections when he had added 0.0.0.0 intending it to mean all addresses. - Steve [0] https://github.com/freenet/fred/blob/next/src/freenet/io/NetworkInterface.java#L397
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
