On 09/20/2015 01:14 PM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 15:25 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> Does anyone have benchmarks that demonstrate native acceleration >> having >> significant performance improvements? Keeping it around makes for >> maintenance, and anecdotes suggest native Java performance is >> sufficient. If it's no longer a clear benefit to have native >> acceleration I'd like to look into removing it to lower maintenance >> load. Thoughts? >> > > Which part of the native code do you propose to get rid of?
Never mind, I was working under the understanding that the native code was going to cause problems, but contrib master builds without fuss. For future reference, the native code is: * libjcpuid * libNativeThread * libfec (unused due to segfaults?) * jbigi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
