Just to head off any other questions, my next post to this thread will be a link to a paper.
Thanks On Jun 10, 2016 7:14 PM, "Michael Grube" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is description is incomplete, the main purpose was to get the general > idea out there. I intended on publishing last week but I got caught up in a > conference and am still not home from it. > > I've addressed this problem, you will hear from me soon. > > Thanks > On Jun 10, 2016 1:28 PM, "Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> Thank you for sharing your work! The fractal scheme sounds pretty >> interesting. >> >> One thing wasn’t yet clear to me: >> >> Michael Grube writes: >> > When a node joins the darknet(I am not considering any opennet cases), >> we >> > may simply decide to choose a location in a generation that fits best >> with >> > our fractal neighborhood. At that point we may pick a location within >> that >> > fractal generation at random and swap until we have our desired >> > distribution of neighbors. >> >> How would we choose a location when we only have a single darknet peer? >> (that’s the standard starting condition for a darknet peer) >> >> Would we use the FOAF of our darknet peer? >> >> Best wishes, >> Arne >> -- >> Unpolitisch sein >> heißt politisch sein >> ohne es zu merken >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devl mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >> > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
