Hey Ian,
I didn't end up with as much time as I'd hoped/expected, but one of my
experiments is promising. I'm working on turning it into a first (pelican)
iteration of the site. I'd like to have it ready Saturday to polish over
this coming weekend.
Thanks,
Dan
On Jan 2, 2017 8:19 AM, "Ian Clarke" <i...@freenetproject.org> wrote:
> Thanks Dan, were you able to make the progressed you had hoped for?
>
> Ian Clarke
> Founder, The Freenet Project
> Email: i...@freenetproject.org
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 4:34 PM, Dan Roberts ademan...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately I didn't find much time between work and three different
>> sets of family, but I believe I can carve out time this weekend. I expect a
>> very low key new years. I have a prospective solution to my biggest pelican
>> concern that I'm very happy with, I'll try to update again this weekend.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>>
>> On Dec 25, 2016 3:24 PM, "Ian Clarke" <i...@freenetproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the update Dan, merry xmas.
>>
>> Ian Clarke
>> Founder, The Freenet Project
>> Email: i...@freenetproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 5:02 PM, Dan Roberts ademan...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to find some time to fully exercise the parts of pelican we
>> need. I still have some concerns and issues I ran into last weekend in my
>> initial exploration, but I'm hopeful they're not showstoppers.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>>
>> On Dec 23, 2016 11:34 AM, "Ian Clarke" <i...@freenetproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys, this conversation seems to have died.
>>
>> Florent/Dan, are you guys on the same page about how we should proceed?
>>
>> Ian.
>>
>> Ian Clarke
>> Founder, The Freenet Project
>> Email: i...@freenetproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 5:09 PM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 4:18 PM, Florent Daigniere
>> nextg...@freenetproject.org wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 10:44 -0800, Dan Roberts wrote:
>>
>> > It is my impression that retaining our transifex translations is a
>>
>> > requirement.
>>
>>
>> I don't think so (we are supposed to re-write/de-clutter the content!);
>>
>>
>> I agree, I the content on the main website must be simplified
>> dramatically relative to what we have now, focussing on the needs of those
>> interested in downloading and using Freenet, and donating to the project.
>> This is a commonly used approach for consumer-facing open source software
>> (eg. https://getfirefox.com/), and I think we should emulate it.
>>
>> "Deeper" content, more relevant to researchers, or developers, should be
>> migrated to a separate wiki (perhaps hosted on Github) - although as an
>> interim measure we can keep the old site around on a different URL. Of
>> course we will provide links to it where appropriate from the main site so
>> it is findable.
>>
>> The perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good. My inclination is to get
>> the new site up ASAP, translations and content can catch up (and will be
>> much easier with a simplified website). I think with a website that looks
>> really good it will also be a good motivator for people to contribute to
>> improve it.
>>
>> From a devops perspective, I think an ideal situation would be to have a
>> limited number of people that can merge pull-requests for the site (but not
>> so limited that it proves to be a bottleneck), and then a merge to master
>> results in an automatic roll-out of the improved site.
>>
>> Ian.
>>
>> Ian Clarke
>> Founder, The Freenet Project
>> Email: i...@freenetproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>> Ian Clarke
>> Founder, The Freenet Project
>> Email: i...@freenetproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>> Ian Clarke
>> Founder, The Freenet Project
>> Email: i...@freenetproject.org
>>
>>
>
> Ian Clarke
> Founder, The Freenet Project
> Email: i...@freenetproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
