> Ok. That answers my earlier question. Stupid of me. Wouldn't it be better to > use two buffers though? One to accept data from a client / other node, so that > they don't have to wait around for everything to finish, and one to use for > tunneling the data along the rest of the way?
That is a sensible suggestion, since we are caching the data locally anyway there is really no reason not to buffer the entire file locally to make the DAtaInsert complete as quickly as possible. The question is - what is the best way to achieve this (it will involve writing-to and reading-from the same file at the same time, might this be an issue on some platforms?). Ian. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
