> Lee Daniel Crocker <lee at piclab.com> wrote: > > (1) "Depth" is gone now, right? I am assuming that replies just > > create their own HopsToLive value so that the replying node can't > > be identified from depth information. > > Oskar pointed out that you still need Depth on the initial messages from > clients so that you can set HopsToLive on reply, in case the route back > gets messed up for some reason.
I don't see the message where he said that, and I still don't see the need. Why can't replies just set their own HTL as long as it is sufficient for any reasonable route back? I do see Ian's comments about DataSource, though, and I'll reword that a bit. ALL: As I'm filling in these details, the latest version will be at http://www.piclab.com/freenet/spec.html, which is now the full document, not just the packet format. -- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee at piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
