Oskar Sandberg <md98-osa at nada.kth.se> wrote: > In light of your changes to the code yesterday, could you please write > something to the list when you make a large change or add a new feature > to the cvs about what you have added and what classes are effected
whoops - just got this. Sorry, I delayed announcing it a little bit until I could make sure it worked and got fproxy working as a demonstration. (Imperial's network connection was down over the weekend, so there was a lot of merging to do - I still have to finish looking at the interaction between the stored headers and the externalized datastore.) Classes... the most noticeable change is that references to the Data class have been changed to a new Document class, which is just a convenient container for Data and a new DataProperties class (and possibly more metadata, later). Message now has a pushField() in addition to the popField(), for manipulating extra headers. If you've incorporated these patches already, there were a few bugs having to do with null key pointers from inform which I've just fixed. There was also some restructuring to eliminate duplicated code between pReceived() and timedOut() in a couple of messages. > Also, was there any reason to use the deprecated save() method of > properties rather then store() (they do the same thing according to the > java docs)? We are trying to avoid deprecated api when it isn't > necessary... oh, I didn't know there was a store() method... (looks) I'm developing under Java 1.1, store() doesn't exist there. theo _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
