-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> Why not a message type "Control"? Obviously, it would only accept
> things like Control.Shutdown if the message had a correct password or
> some other authentication, but it might be handy for other things as
> well (client aborts, configuration, etc.)
Then we'd need authentication. It would be quite dangerous without,
obviously. We can assume that if we use STDIN/OUT, that its anchored to a
pipe with the correct permissions assigned (on unix anyway).
Scott
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE4+0C0pXyM95IyRhURAt4uAKDPvJu5RS7LZl3bZXDP/VaYFg0QMwCgs4G+
QaMAYP/g71xgt0XdbJR3/Vw=
=2HA0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
