-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> MD5 isn't very secure either. SHA is, I think, the current gold standard
> for such things. Hal, you're the cypherguru here (and the only one with
> a PGP key older than mine:), what are your thoughts on best algorithms
> for CHKs/SVKs?
MD5 has a questionable collision attack, SHA doesn't (as far as anyone
knows). SHA is slower, but NSA approved. :) SHA is definitely in the
public domain. SHA is 160 bits as opposed to 128. . . sensing a pattern?
Scott
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5AKDhpXyM95IyRhURAhcbAKCrVKH+pt5DBdel84ik9KePeS/SlgCgrRT+
F5R5jkVMatsePSeeeMPdPpo=
=DFOU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
