> Addresses look like "udp/224.0.0.1:19114".  Is this not what you meant?

This is fine if it uses freenet protocol. I just subconsciously assumed
that a udp implementation (especially multicasted) would use some kind of
variant of the protocol that was more compressed. If it uses vanilla FP
then that's great.



_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to