On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, david at aminal.com wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 03:17:10PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
<snip> 
> Oh man - I know this one is going to bite me, probably multiple times. 
> Ideally,
> the bad references should be marked, maybe with a count, and removed after a
> message has been sent. But, since I can't write this, at least right now, I'll
> be happy with whatever works :-)

Big Homer style DOH! I feel pretty dumb now. Thanks for being lending me a
brain - this is of course the right approach.

> Any thoughts about a maximum htl? There was another request with htl > 150
> bouncing around the network this morning, my node saw it at least a dozen 
> times.

It is two lines, so I guess why not. Anybody feel like guessing at number?

> 
> David Schutt 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
-- 

Oskar Sandberg

md98-osa at nada.kth.se

#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)

_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to