On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 09:05:30PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, I think that's great. There will be people that no matter how long I
> > lecture them, will still say "But...it's in JAVA!" so it's good to have an
> > alternative that just says "We are fast! We are in C! We use an SQL
> > database!" so that they will leave us other develops alone.
> 
> Complaining about speed and efficiency in Java, and then going out and
> implementing a C solution around a *SQL database* is madness.  I am all-for
> efficiency, but even in the best of cases, I have always disliked the 
> frequently
> unnecessary overhead of a separate database, using a database for the 
> datastore
> would be fantastically inefficient and would make a mockery of any 
> efficiencies
> introduced elsewhere.

Yeah, and also most people would not want the overhead of constantly
running a full SQL server on their boxen.

> The vast majority of those who express bigotry about Java are speaking from a
> position of ignorance.  Sure blackdown's java is crap, we all know this, use
> IBM's JRE if you care about speed, it is comparable to a C++ implementation.  
> As agl pointed out in a recent conversation,
> network latency will likely be the bottleneck, not processor speed.

Is IBM's JRE available precompiled for boxen running Linux/PPC?  Or
better yet, is it available in source (which isn't likely)?  I
couldn't get Kaffe to compile on my box and the only JRE that I could
find precompiled for Linux/PPC was Sun/Blackdown.

-- 
Travis Bemann
Sendmail is still screwed up on my box.
My email address is really bemann at execpc.com.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1682 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000805/4584d22d/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to