On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Brandon wrote: > > Not to be undone, I would like to note that I completed CHK support > > yesterday as > > well. > > The poor perl and python client writers are going to have to go on special > diets in order to keep up. > > The new release is going to be so incredibly much cooler than the last > release.
Speaking of which, do we have any perl coders here? It's become quite clear that I will not have time to get back to Liberator. I sort of got stuck on getting MPI working well for the DF exchange, and then I got bored. I don't know if there is any point in it though, with KSSes, SVKs, CHKs, KSKs, link level encryption, stream control etc, the existing parts are about 10% of work toward a functioning 0.3 client. And probably not even a very good ten percent. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev -- \oskar _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
