> > I must be decidedly unclever here, because I don't understand what the > issue is at all. The issue is if several freenet nodes operate in a small block of changing IP addresses. Its very likely that one node will occupy the IP address of a previous node. This would cause the node contacting it to believe that its been subverted or at least changed its key. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000818/aaeced87/attachment.pgp>
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Brandon
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Scott G. Miller
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Travis Bemann
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Alex Barnell
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Brandon
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Brandon
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a pub... Henry Hemming
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Zem
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Scott G. Miller
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Oskar Sandberg
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Scott G. Miller
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Oskar Sandberg
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Scott G. Miller
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... [email protected]
- [Freenet-dev] Re: Associating a... Brandon
- [Freenet-dev] Associating a public key with node addresse... Michael Wiktowy
