> I consider this is a security hole, and I will not have it. Putting the > metadata-length in a visible field is bad enough, and we only did that > because we figured there could be a concievable use for being able to send > back only the meta-data.
I would be happy with a Freenet-control-message=yes/no field. It gives no more information than DataLength-Metadatalength in Scott's proposal. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
