> I understand that all nodes must use the same measure of key closeness in > order for document clustering to be useful. (The sets of documents that a > node caches for its neighbours should overlap.) However, each node has a > different view of the network's topology, and routing still works, so I'm > still not convinced that each node having a different view of the network's > performance will break routing. I'm not sure how to reconcile those two > positions, but I'm working on it. No, each node has a small view of the same network topology. In the current situation, each node sees a part of the topology, but all nodes agree on the topology. With any sort of connection metering, each node has a different view of the topology and things don't work.
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000821/5e745cf4/attachment.pgp>
