Well, the problem with Swing is that it adds to the download quite a bit.
>From what I remember the whole Swing lib is close to 2 MB - I'm not sure
that's the best way to go. Looking at Napster, it should be possible to come
up with an AWT version that's reasonably similar - Swing would be slicker,
but at the end of the day, if it's between a slicker interface and a smaller
download, I would go with a smaller download :) Anyway, I'm finishing a
project today/tomorrow, so the earliest I could start working on the
front-end design/implementation would be Saturday.

Michael


----- Original Message -----
From: Ian Clarke <[email protected]>
To: <freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Freenet-dev] An opportunity


> Swing would be good, we could deploy it using Sun's WebStart technology,
> or something similar (but it *must* be very easy to deploy on a variety
> of platforms which *must*, sadly, include Windows).  Can you handle
> this?  Look at FNC if you need inspiration (see contrib page on freenet
> website).
>
> Ian.
>
> Michael Mehrle wrote:
> >
> > I am a 'mere' Java programmer, but I would volunteer to hack together
the UI
> > for this app if someone else would do the protocol/storage part. My
> > background is in user interface design and I could probably come up with
> > something that is very close to Napster in a manner of days. Again, it
would
> > be in AWT or Swing, since I'm not a C/C++  or MFC programmer.
> >
> > Let me know what you guys think...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
>


_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to